When students follow their own interests, their learning deepens and expands, sometimes in ways that I could not predict. I get to then see the material from their perspective, which informs how I teach it the next time around.
When Bill Flack came to Bucknell in 2000, he planned to continue his research along the path he’d already forged: “laboratory work on emotion, and clinical work on combat-related trauma.” Instead, his seminar students’ interest in studying sexual assault on campus led the professor of psychology in a new direction.
“Students in my trauma seminar became interested in how the literature on campus sexual assault related to Bucknell. We decided to do a survey, and that was the start of more than 15 years of research.”
Flack has focused on psychological trauma since 1996 and did postdoctoral research with combat veterans. Until coming to Bucknell, he performed lab research on emotions and did clinical work with trauma.
His students’ interest has been a major factor in keeping the sexual assault research going. “Without their expertise, I would not know which factors to focus on to try to improve our understanding” of sexual assault on campus.
That’s not to say his and the students’ research has been without controversy. He tries to teach students in class and on his research team that “disagreement is part of the research process, especially in social justice topics.”
He explained that to produce a more socially just world means the status quo must change. “Those happy with the status quo won’t be happy with the changes,” says Flack.
In addition to his work as a faculty member and his annual research through the Sexual Assault Survey, Flack, through a Fulbright scholarship in Northern Ireland, became a part of an international cross-border research group on sexual violence. Back in the United States, he was asked to take part in the Administrator-Researcher Campus Climate Consortium (ARC3), which developed a new, modular survey on campus sexual assault, which in a modified form has been used by Flack during his annual research survey.
“Although in class I provide the basic structure and much of the reading, I also give students leeway to focus on what they find most interesting,” she says. “When they follow their own interests, their learning deepens and expands, sometimes in ways that I could not predict. I get to then see the material from their perspective, which informs how I teach it the next time around. So perhaps rather than a two-way street, it’s more like a roundabout.”
Posted Sept. 22, 2016
The following links are virtual breadcrumbs marking the 27 most recent pages you have visited in Bucknell.edu. If you want to remember a specific page forever click the pin in the top right corner and we will be sure not to replace it. Close this message.